Ban charm and bad multiplayer card
This commit is contained in:
parent
717a690a9c
commit
990bae1c97
2 changed files with 7 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -87,10 +87,16 @@ payload = """sendInfoMessage("Attempting to register the Walled Garden ruleset..
|
||||||
"c_Roland_void",
|
"c_Roland_void",
|
||||||
-- Why add more variance on something that's already volatile?
|
-- Why add more variance on something that's already volatile?
|
||||||
"c_mp_ectoplasm_standard",
|
"c_mp_ectoplasm_standard",
|
||||||
|
-- There wasn't anything wrong with regular Wraith to begin with.
|
||||||
|
-- Don't fix what ain't broke!
|
||||||
|
"c_mp_wraith",
|
||||||
-- Almost always better than any other planet card.
|
-- Almost always better than any other planet card.
|
||||||
"c_mp_asteroid",
|
"c_mp_asteroid",
|
||||||
},
|
},
|
||||||
jokers = {
|
jokers = {
|
||||||
|
-- Strictly a downside when ante number does not exist.
|
||||||
|
-- Despite being a charm, it can be banned as though it was a joker.
|
||||||
|
"BakeryCharm_Bakery_Cogwheel",
|
||||||
-- See `j_mr_bones`
|
-- See `j_mr_bones`
|
||||||
"j_Bakery_Wearywolf",
|
"j_Bakery_Wearywolf",
|
||||||
-- See below.
|
-- See below.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
"priority": 10000001,
|
"priority": 10000001,
|
||||||
"version": "1.0.12",
|
"version": "1.0.13",
|
||||||
"id": "WalledGarden",
|
"id": "WalledGarden",
|
||||||
"name": "WalledGarden",
|
"name": "WalledGarden",
|
||||||
"icon_path": "icon.png",
|
"icon_path": "icon.png",
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue